General Information/Fuzzy Borders
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fuzzy Borders
With our increasing knowledge of the diversity of the mobilome, the distinction between IS and other TE is becoming increasing unclear. The major feature used to distinguish IS from transposons was that the former (Fig.8.1) lack phenotypically detectable passenger genes (genes not involved in the transposition process) while the latter include one or more such genes (for antibiotic resistance, virulence and pathogenicity functions or genes permitting the use of unusual compounds). This is no longer the case (Fig.8.1).
As shown in Fig.8.1, examples have now been identified in which passenger genes are located within an IS, called tIS (ISs and relatives with passenger genes)[1] or in which TE with typical transposon structures are devoid of transposition proteins MITEs (Miniature Inverted repeat Transposable Elements) and MICs (Mobile Insertion Cassette))[2][3][4][5]. The (hypothetical) relationship between these different autonomous (with transposase) and non-autonomous IS derivatives is indicated in Fig.8.1 [6][7]. |
Bibliography
- ↑
- ↑
- ↑
- ↑ Brügger K, Redder P, She Q, Confalonieri F, Zivanovic Y, Garrett RA . Mobile elements in archaeal genomes. - FEMS Microbiol Lett: 2002 Jan 10, 206(2);131-41 [PubMed:11814653] [DOI]
- ↑
- ↑ Siguier P, Gourbeyre E, Chandler M . Bacterial insertion sequences: their genomic impact and diversity. - FEMS Microbiol Rev: 2014 Sep, 38(5);865-91 [PubMed:24499397] [DOI]
- ↑