Difference between revisions of "General Information/Fuzzy Borders"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
− |
Revision as of 13:46, 4 December 2022
Fuzzy Borders
With our increasing knowledge of the diversity of the mobilome, the distinction between IS and other TE is becoming increasing unclear. The major feature used to distinguish IS from transposons was that the former (Fig.8.1) lack phenotypically detectable passenger genes (genes not involved in the transposition process) while the latter include one or more such genes (for antibiotic resistance, virulence and pathogenicity functions or genes permitting the use of unusual compounds). This is no longer the case (Fig.8.1).
As shown in Fig.8.1, examples have now been identified in which passenger genes are located within an IS, called tIS (ISs and relatives with passenger genes)[1] or in which TE with typical transposon structures are devoid of transposition proteins MITEs (Miniature Inverted repeat Transposable Elements) and MICs (Mobile Insertion Cassette))[2][3][4][5]. The (hypothetical) relationship between these different autonomous (with transposase) and non-autonomous IS derivatives is indicated in Fig.8.1 [6][7]. |
Bibliography
- ↑ Siguier P, Gagnevin L, Chandler M . The new IS1595 family, its relation to IS1 and the frontier between insertion sequences and transposons. - Res Microbiol: 2009 Apr, 160(3);232-41 [PubMed:19286454] [DOI]
- ↑
- ↑
- ↑ Brügger K, Redder P, She Q, Confalonieri F, Zivanovic Y, Garrett RA . Mobile elements in archaeal genomes. - FEMS Microbiol Lett: 2002 Jan 10, 206(2);131-41 [PubMed:11814653] [DOI]
- ↑
- ↑
- ↑ Siguier P, Gourbeyre E, Varani A, Ton-Hoang B, Chandler M . Everyman's Guide to Bacterial Insertion Sequences. - Microbiol Spectr: 2015 Apr, 3(2);MDNA3-0030-2014 [PubMed:26104715] [DOI]